Search for: All records

Abstract We present a 3D shape analysis of both dark matter (DM) and stellar matter (SM) in simulated dwarf galaxies to determine whether stellar shape traces DM shape. Using 80 central and satellite dwarf galaxies from three simulation suites (“Marvelous Massive Dwarfs,” “Marvelous Dwarfs,” and the “DC Justice League”) spanning stellar masses of 10⁶–10¹⁰M_⊙, we measure 3D shapes through the moment of inertia tensor at twice the effective radius to derive axis ratios (C/AandB/A) and triaxiality. We find that stellar shape does follow DM halo shape for our dwarf galaxies. However, the presence of a stellar disk in more massive dwarfs (M_* ≳ 10^7.5M_⊙) pulls the distribution of stellarC/Aratios to lower values, while in lower-mass galaxies the gravitational potential remains predominantly shaped by DM. Similarly, stellar triaxiality generally tracks DM triaxiality, with this relationship being particularly strong for nondisky galaxies and weaker in disky systems. These correlations are reinforced by strong alignment between the SM and DM axes, particularly in disk galaxies. Further, we find no detectable difference in either SM or DM shapes when comparing two different supernova feedback implementations, demonstrating that shape measurements are robust to different implementations of baryonic feedback in dwarf galaxies. We also observe that a dwarf galaxy’s shape is largely unperturbed by recent mergers. This comprehensive study demonstrates that stellar shape measurements can serve as a reliable tool for inferring DM shapes in dwarf galaxies. 

Abstract Due to their inability to self-regulate, ultrafaint dwarfs are sensitive to prescriptions in subgrid physics models that converge and regulate at higher masses. We use high-resolution cosmological simulations to compare the effect of bursty star formation histories (SFHs) on dwarf galaxy structure for two different subgrid supernova (SN) feedback models, superbubble and blastwave, in dwarf galaxies with stellar masses from 5000 <M_*/M_⊙< 10⁹. We find that in the “MARVEL-ous Dwarfs” suite both feedback models produce cored galaxies and reproduce observed scaling relations for luminosity, mass, and size. Our sample accurately predicts the average stellar metallicity at higher masses, however low-mass dwarfs are metal poor relative to observed galaxies in the Local Group. We show that continuous bursty star formation and the resulting stellar feedback are able to create dark matter (DM) cores in the higher dwarf galaxy mass regime, while the majority of ultrafaint and classical dwarfs retain cuspy central DM density profiles. We find that the effective core formation peaks atM_*/M_halo≃ 5 × 10⁻³for both feedback models. Both subgrid SN models yield bursty SFHs at higher masses; however, galaxies simulated with superbubble feedback reach maximum mean burstiness values at lower stellar mass fractions relative to blastwave feedback. As a result, core formation may be better predicted by stellar mass fraction than the burstiness of SFHs. 

Abstract We present deep Hubble Space Telescope photometry of 10 targets from Treasury Program GO-14734, including six confirmed ultrafaint dwarf (UFD) galaxies, three UFD candidates, and one likely globular cluster. Six of these targets are satellites of, or have interacted with, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). We determine their structural parameters using a maximum-likelihood technique. Using our newly derived half-light radius (r_h) andV-band magnitude (M_V) values in addition to literature values for other UFDs, we find that UFDs associated with the LMC do not show any systematic differences from Milky Way UFDs in the magnitude–size plane. Additionally, we convert simulated UFD properties from the literature into theM_V–r_hobservational space to examine the abilities of current dark matter (DM) and baryonic simulations to reproduce observed UFDs. Some of these simulations adopt alternative DM models, thus allowing us to also explore whether theM_V–r_hplane could be used to constrain the nature of DM. We find no differences in the magnitude–size plane between UFDs simulated with cold, warm, and self-interacting DM, but note that the sample of UFDs simulated with alternative DM models is quite limited at present. As more deep, wide-field survey data become available, we will have further opportunities to discover and characterize these ultrafaint stellar systems and the greater low surface-brightness universe.